This article is more than 5 years old.
Formal presentation: A Primer on Blended Learning (Donna Petherbridge, Traci Temple)
- Very much an overview, but a nice general session
- Student characteristics
- Demand we-based ed, prefer some tech, expect faculty to use some tech
- Net Gen & Millennials (lumped together when comes to interest in online learning)
- Web interactions have lead to an expectation for interaction and input into what and how they’re learning
- Students still say teachers are invaluable to learning; online education often means LOTS of email for instructor… because they still want access to expert
- Blended Learning (lots of definitions)
- Combining learning modes, teaching method/learning styles, teaching and learning strategies, learning in different contexts, and mixed approaches
- Reduction in class time: refers to “Hybrid Learning,” not necessarily “Blended Learning.”
- Mixed mode looks like: socialization group learning with learning possibilities of online environment
- Student centered looks like: shift from lecture to student centered, new teaching strategies, teachers as facilitators, and focus on engaged instruction
- Viewed on a continuum (Carol A. Twigg)
- Supplemental Model (traditional with online elements)
- Could be PowerPoint that you post online
- Could be a podcast, blog, discussion board
- Online quizzes
- CDROM/DVD with rich, interactive activities, simulations, movies
- Fully Online Model (majority/all instruction online)
- Students can access course anytime, anyplace, with asynchronous meetings
- Content available online; materials could have been created collaboratively with multiple faculty members focusing only on their areas of expertise
- Assignments within context of LMS at own pace
- Replacement Model (Blended Learning)
- Can reduce number of meeting times
- Technology-based instructional activities
- In-person classes could remain same (or change)
- Can work individually or in small groups
- Activity based learning fosters critical thinking skills
- At own pace
- Learning materials can match students’ personal learning styles
- Weekly quizzes replace homework grading (sound familiar?!)
- Automatic grading and record keeping
- Links to additional learning resources: streaming media, lecture notes, exercise
- Instructors spend time responding to students’ questions and needs
- Supplemental Model (traditional with online elements)
- Blended Learning Research
- Recommends Educause (who doesn’t love it?)
- Recommends looking at Program in Course Redesign at University of Central Florida
- Examples
- Demo-ed eFlashcards that incorporated pronunciation
- Blended website for an entomology course
- Benefits to students
- Students like blended environment
- Flexible course format
- Active & student-centered
- Greater interaction (student-faculty, student-student, student-content)
- Part of learning process/learning communities
- Serves varied learning styles
- Increases learning outcomes
- Better attendance, completion, and retention rates
- Flexible, fits with “real life” family issues/work responsibilities, etc.
- Institutional Interest
- Increased student learning
- More efficient classroom use, increases capacity of facilities
- “Supersection” model (I can’t imagine we’d ever see this at WFU, but we do something like this at UNCG) More info, see: Hartman and Moskai
- Issues for administrators
- Classroom scheduling, technology needs, testing facilities
- Institutional Questions
- Accreditation, institution definition of BL, how listed in catalog
- Overview
- Blend “high-touch” with “high-tech”
- Many different models
- Will take time to develop courses